Spatial and temporal patterns in the threats to at-risk freshwater fish species in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study identifies the current spatial and temporal patterns of threats to at-risk freshwater fishes within Canada. Data for 65 at-risk freshwater fishes were collated from the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada Assessment and Status reports with threat calculators. Using these data, the overall threat impact level and the threat impact of the 11 categories in the threat calculator were compared for all species and separately by conservation status, which indicates their risk of extinction. These threats were also compared temporally to a study completed in 2006 and spatially between National Freshwater Biogeographic Zones. The threats of invasive species and pollution had the highest impacts, accounting for 18.9% and 16.8% of the weighted impact on at-risk freshwater fishes, respectively. Since 2006, all threats have been increasing, except for natural disasters. The Great Lakes–Upper St. Lawrence River Biogeographic Zone had significantly more at-risk freshwater fishes and overall weighted threat impact than other zones, with pollution, invasive species, and natural system modification contributing the most to the imperilment in this region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".