Development Of Putu Bendera Promotional Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research was motivated by the absence of putu bendera promotional media in the form of making putu bendera advertising videos. The purpose of development in this study is to develop putu bendera promotional media in the form of putu bendera advertising videos so that putu bendera is better known to the wider community.This type of research is development research with the development model used is Planning, Production, and Evaluation (PPE). The trials in this study consist of 3, namely validity tests, practicality tests and effectiveness tests. While the data analysis technique used is a descriptive data analysis technique, namely by describing the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of using putu bendera ad videos.The results of this development conclude as follows; (1) Expert validation is declared very valid with an average value categorized as very valid (2) The practicality of the putu bendera ad video based on the practicality test on the putu bendera maker is declared very practical (3) The effectiveness of the putu bendera ad video based on the effectiveness test to the community in Barus District with the effective category. The conclusion of this study is that this putu bendera advertising video is valid, practical, and effective to increase public attraction to putu flag.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".