MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388588427 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad179.0976

QOL-24. FINANCIAL AID REQUESTS BY BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS IN ONTARIO THROUGH GOFUNDME

2023· article· en· W4388588427 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kaviya Devaraja, Jonathan Avery, Yajur Iyengar, Andy Zhang, Seth Climans

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisFinancePsychosocialDistressIndirect costsMedicineQualitative researchPsychologyBusinessPsychiatryClinical psychologyAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain tumors affect individuals globally including Ontario residents. Numerous Ontario brain tumor patients suffer the unequal burden of responsibility to pay for treatments like oral chemotherapy. In addition to chemotherapy, patients and their families have other costs associated with their diagnosis. However, less is known about other direct and indirect financial costs due to their diagnosis. GoFundMe, an online fundraising platform, provides worldwide brain tumor patients the opportunity to raise money for financial assistance with costs associated with their diagnosis The purpose of this study was to analyze publicly-available data from GoFundMe, an online fundraising platform, to explore the financial needs of brain tumor patients across Ontario, unaware and/or unable to get assistance elsewhere. A qualitative descriptive design drawing on thematic analysis was used to analyze GoFundMe requests to support individuals diagnosed with brain cancer in Ontario between 2014 and 2021. A coding framework was created to determine emerging themes using qualitative data analysis software NVivo 10. A final sample of 154 requests described financial strain from the loss of income experienced by the patient and their caregivers to afford cancer treatments. Requests highlighted 1) an overall lack of awareness of how and where access financial aid and affordable psychosocial support; 2) concerns over the long-term financial well-being of bereaving family members; 3) A call for more public awareness of the financial burden and emotional distress experienced by of those impacted by brain cancer. These GoFundMe requests highlight a connection between financial burden and emotional distress and an overall lack of awareness of where/how to seek financial and emotional support. These results will serve as the foundation to advocate for and raise awareness of the financial assistance needed by brain tumor patients and their families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerFrench-language works237,207