MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388592066 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2023.0214

Comparative Study of Immunodeficient Rat Strains in Engraftment of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Airway Epithelia

2023· article· en· W4388592066 on OpenAlexaff
Yasuyuki Hayashi, Hiroe Ohnishi, Masayuki Kitano, Yo Kishimoto, Toshiaki Takezawa, Hideaki Okuyama, Masayoshi Yoshimatsu, Fumihiko Kuwata, Takeshi Tada, Keisuke Mizuno, Koichi Omori

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part A · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellXenotransplantationTransplantationImmunosuppressionStem cellHumanized mouseBiologyImmunologyCellAirwayEmbryonic stem cellMucusCell biologyPathologyMedicineImmune systemInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The airway epithelia (AE) play a role in the clearance of foreign substances through ciliary motility and mucus secreted. We developed an artificial trachea that is made of collagen sponges and polypropylene mesh for the regeneration of the tracheal defect, and it was used for a clinical study. Then, a model in which the luminal surface of an artificial trachea was covered with a human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived AE (hiPSC-AE) was transplanted into the tracheal defect of nude rats to promote epithelialization. In the future, this model was expected to be applied to research on infectious diseases and drug discovery as a trachea-humanized rat model. However, at present, sufficient engraftment has not been achieved to evaluate functional recovery in transplanted cells. Therefore, this study focused on immunosuppression in recipient rats. Nude rats lack T cell function and are widely used for transplantation experiments; however, more severe immunosuppressed recipients are preferred for xenotransplantation. Several strains of immunodeficient rats were created as rats that exhibit more severe immunodeficiency until now. In this study, to establish a trachea-humanized rat model in which human AE function can be analyzed to improve engraftment efficiency, engraftment efficiency in nude rats and X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) rats following hiPSC-AE transplantation was compared. In the analysis of the proportion of engrafted cells in total cells at the graft site, the engraftment efficiency of epithelial cells tended to be high in X-SCID rats, although no statistical difference was found between the two groups, whereas the engraftment efficiency of mesenchymal cells was higher in X-SCID rats. Furthermore, the number of immune cells that accumulated in the grafts showed that a pan T cell marker, that is, CD3-positive cells, did not differ between the two strains; however, CD45-positive cells and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-positive cells significantly decreased in X-SCID rats. These results indicate that X-SCID rats are more useful for the transplantation of hiPSC-AE into the tracheae to generate trachea-humanized rat models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTissue Engineering Part ASame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207