MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388595943 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.951

Dietary sodium intake and outcomes: a secondary analysis from SODIUM - HF

2023· article· en· W4388595943 on OpenAlexafffund
E COLINRAMIREZ, C I Saldarriaga, Wendimagegn Alemayehu, Justin A. Ezekowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreUniversity of Alberta
FundersHealth Research Council of New ZealandCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelSodiumInternal medicineConfidence intervalDiabetes mellitusHeart failureEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Sodium restriction is common advice provided to patients with heart failure, however, evidence from the SODIUM-HF trial and a subsequent meta-analysis failed to show a beneficial effect of dietary sodium restriction on outcomes. Purpose This secondary analysis of SODIUM HF is aimed to assess association between baseline dietary sodium intake, the change in dietary sodium at 6 months and a composite of cardiovascular hospitalization, emergency department visit, and all-cause death at 12 and 24 months. Methods Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess association of dietary sodium level measured at randomization with primary and secondary endpoints. Adjusted Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were presented. A responder analysis also explored the achieved dietary sodium at 6 months with subsequent risk for clinical outcomes. Results 792 participants were included. At baseline, sodium intake was ≤ 1500 mg/day in 19.9% (n = 158), >1500-3000 mg/day in 56.5% (n = 448) and >3000 mg/day in 23.4% (n= 186) of the participants. Women, older patients, and those with lower glomerular filtration rate and higher ejection fraction were more often represented in the group with sodium intake ≤1500 mg/day; conversely, diabetes, prior smoking, use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and ICD were observed in the groups of higher sodium intake levels (>3000 mg/day)(Table 1). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed no association between sodium level (per doubling) at baseline with clinical outcomes (all associations p=ns), however, adjusted models exhibited a trend towards a decreased risk of CV hospitalizations at 2 years. In the responder analysis, a trend towards a decreased adjusted risk for composite outcome and CV hospitalizations at 1 year in those achieving a sodium level <1500 mg at 6 months was observed (Table 2). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed no association for 1- and 2-year outcomes per 500 mg increase in absolute difference in sodium level between baseline and 6 months. Conclusion In SODIUM HF, there was no association between sodium level at baseline with clinical outcomes at any time point but there is a trend towards a decreased risk of CV hospitalizations at 2 years and in patients achieving <1500 mg / day by 6 months, a trend towards fewer subsequent clinical events was present. This finding should be explored via a prospective clinical trial.Baseline characteristics of populationOutcomes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207