MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Treatment of microvascular angina with the coronary sinus reducer: a first experience

2023· article· en· W4388601206 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eleonora Gnan, Giacomo Maria Cioffi, Matthias Bossard, Mehdi Madanchi, I Majcen, Yuan Zhi, Varis Gjergjizi, T Seiler, Florim Cuculi, Adrian Attinger

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAnginaCoronary sinusCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveRevascularizationMaceCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyCoronary flow reserveAcute coronary syndromePercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Coronary Sinus Reducer (CSR) is an hourglass-shaped device approved for the treatment of refractory angina. Its percutaneous implantation in the coronary sinus leads to a retrograde increase in venous pressure, which is thought to improve capillary recruitment and perfusion to the ischemic myocardium. No data is however available on the use of the CSR to treat microvascular angina, an increasingly recognized but still poorly understood condition. In this preliminary study, we evaluated the efficacy of the CSR in a small cohort of patients with non-obstructive disease. We screened consecutive patients from the prospective COMPLEX registry that received a CSR for refractory angina between June 2018 and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (<50% narrowing in all coronary arteries, or a negative intracoronary fractional flow reserve test) and no prior history of revascularization. Endpoints were angina and dyspnea symptoms, evaluated with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the New York Hearth Association (NYHA) scores respectively, procedural success rate, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. We ultimately enrolled 8 patients; 6 (75%) were females and mean age was 67.8±9.9 years. Their baseline characteristics are further depicted in table 1. Microvascular dysfunction was invasively confirmed in 5 (62.5%) patients; mean index of microvascular resistance (IMR) was 32.8±15.7 and mean coronary flow reserve (CFR) was 1.7±0.7. In one patient, reduced global CFR (1.4) was evident on cardiac magnetic resonance examination. At baseline, mean CCS class was 2.9±0.6, NYHA class 2±0.9, and number of antianginal drugs 2.6±1.6. Procedural success was 100%, with only one patient experiencing a procedure-related complication (sternocleidomastoid muscle hematoma requiring no intervention). At a median follow-up of 647.5 days (IQR 132-732), mean CCS class was 1.5±0.8, NYHA class 1.9±0.9 and number of antianginal drugs 1.9±1.1. All patients improved by ≥1 CCS class and 3 (37.5%) by ≥2 CCS classes. No MACE was observed. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first report of CSR implantation for the treatment of microvascular angina. Our positive results are particularly promising given the paucity of treatment options currently available for the condition, but larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.table 1figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207