OpenProt 2.0 builds a path to the functional characterization of alternative proteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The OpenProt proteogenomic resource (https://www.openprot.org/) provides users with a complete and freely accessible set of non-canonical or alternative open reading frames (AltORFs) within the transcriptome of various species, as well as functional annotations of the corresponding protein sequences not found in standard databases. Enhancements in this update are largely the result of user feedback and include the prediction of structure, subcellular localization, and intrinsic disorder, using cutting-edge algorithms based on machine learning techniques. The mass spectrometry pipeline now integrates a machine learning-based peptide rescoring method to improve peptide identification. We continue to help users explore this cryptic proteome by providing OpenCustomDB, a tool that enables users to build their own customized protein databases, and OpenVar, a genomic annotator including genetic variants within AltORFs and protein sequences. A new interface improves the visualization of all functional annotations, including a spectral viewer and the prediction of multicoding genes. All data on OpenProt are freely available and downloadable. Overall, OpenProt continues to establish itself as an important resource for the exploration and study of new proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".