MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388622580 · doi:10.1093/jrsssc/qlad100

A Bayesian latent class model for integrating multi-source longitudinal data: application to the CHILD cohort study

2023· article· en· W4388622580 on OpenAlexafffund
Zihang Lu, Padmaja Subbarao, Wendy Lou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoQueen's University
FundersInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAstraZeneca CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Lung AssociationCanadian Allergy, Asthma and Immunology FoundationAstraZeneca
KeywordsCluster analysisLongitudinal dataComputer scienceBayesian probabilityData setLatent class modelData miningLongitudinal studySet (abstract data type)Class (philosophy)StatisticsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multi-source longitudinal data have become increasingly common. This type of data refers to longitudinal datasets collected from multiple sources describing the same set of individuals. Representing distinct features of the individuals, each data source may consist of multiple longitudinal markers of distinct types and measurement frequencies. Motivated by the CHILD cohort study, we develop a model for joint clustering multi-source longitudinal data. The proposed model allows each data source to follow source-specific clustering, and they are aggregated to yield a global clustering. The proposed model is demonstrated through real-data analysis and simulation study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207