MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Las fuentes de energía renovable en Nova Scotia: Estrategias del gobierno provincial frente a las presiones del gobierno federal canadiense para alcanzar su meta de cero emisiones para 2050

2023· article· es· W4388623849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oliver Santín, Gavin Fridell

Bibliographic record

VenueNorteamérica · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAustralian Government
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceNova scotiaGeographyArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El gobierno federal canadiense bajo la administración del primer ministro liberal Justin Trudeau, estableció en 2021 su compromiso para que Canadá comenzara una reducción gradual de sus emisiones contaminantes hasta llegar a cero en 2050. Tal directriz, significa que las diez provincias y tres territorios del país, deben ajustar de forma autónoma sus estrategias para sumarse a esa meta en un ejercicio común establecido desde el gobierno central. Para el caso particular de la provincia atlántica de Nova Scotia, este mandato federal representa un enorme reto, ya que su infraestructura, desarrollada desde el siglo XVII, giró en buena medida alrededor de la generación de energía fósil. Este trabajo señala los obstáculos culturales y corporativos, las potencialidades de la energía alternativa, y las estrategias políticas que han debido desarrollar los líderes de la provincia para encontrar la estrategia más adecuada que sume a Nova Scotia a la dinámica que ya se ha emprendido en todas las regiones del país.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorteaméricaSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207