MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Attempting to Aggregate Perceptual Constructs From Deep Neural Networks for Video and Audio Interaction Representation

2023· article· en· W4388624011 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc-Antoine Maheux, Guillaume Auclair, Philippe Warren, Dominic Létourneau, François Michaud

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatureCompute CanadaAGE-WELL
KeywordsRobotPerceptionComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Human–computer interactionHuman–robot interactionNatural (archaeology)Aggregate (composite)Everyday lifeProcess (computing)Artificial intelligencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Socially Assistive Robots are foreseen as having the potential to improve the quality of life of older adults and individuals with mental disabilities. Natural human-robot interaction in everyday settings may require robots that are capable of understanding what is happening in their operating environments so that they can respond appropriately to the experienced situations and engage people in meaningful ways. This paper presents an approach using perceptual constructs to represent what is being observed by the robot. Perceptual constructs are derived from deep neural networks used to process visual and audio data. The objective is to derive a compressed representation of the interactions observed by the robot in real-life settings. Results are provided from observations made by a robot of a room with human activity over a two-week period, outlining what works and remaining challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207