Developing Adaptive, Personalised, Autonomous Social Robots Using Physiological Signals: System Development and a Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maintaining physical, emotional and psychological health is vital for well-being. Social robots have been increasingly used in healthcare to support physical and mental health. Providing appropriate, adaptive and personalised feedback based on the user’s internal states is crucial for effective and engaging human-robot interaction, especially in one-to-one interaction scenarios. In this research, we developed an adaptive and autonomous system, integrating a social robot, a wearable non-intrusive Polar chest sensor and algorithms to guide people in three application scenarios to promote physical, emotional, and psychological well-being. The social robot senses users’ psychophysiological measures such as heart rate and heart-rate variability via the wearable sensor, monitors their stress responses, provides real-time feedback and guides them to perform activities. We detail the system development and a pilot study with fifteen participants to evaluate the system in the three scenarios. The findings suggest that the autonomous system could effectively guide participants through the activities by regulating their stress responses. Participants’ physiological data also support these results. Moreover, the system was well-accepted by its users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".