MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388626055 · doi:10.25251/skin.7.supp.258

Maintenance of Clinical Response With Continued Risankizumab Treatment for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Through 304 Weeks: Interim Analysis of the LIMMitless Open-Label Extension Study

2023· article· en· W4388626055 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Lebwohl, H. Bachelez, Kenneth Gordon, Tianshuang Wu, Michael Chen, Blair Kaplan, Kim Papp

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsProbity Medical Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasis Area and Severity IndexPsoriasisInternal medicineAdverse effectMaintenance therapyInterim analysisClinical trialRandomized controlled trialGastroenterologySurgeryChemotherapyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Interleukin (IL)-23 is a key regulator of plaque psoriasis pathogenesis. Risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits IL-23 by binding to its p19 subunit, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults; however, additional data on long-term maintenance of efficacy with risankizumab treatment are needed. Here we report on the maintenance of clinical response through 304 weeks of continuous risankizumab treatment. Methods: In this interim analysis, we evaluated patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were randomized to receive risankizumab 150 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16 and every 12 weeks thereafter during 2 double‑blind, phase 3, 52-week base studies (UltIMMa 1 [NCT02684370] and UltIMMa 2 [NCT02684357]) and enrolled in LIMMitless, an ongoing, phase 3, multicenter, single‑arm, open-label extension (OLE) study (NCT03047395) evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of continuous risankizumab 150 mg treatment every 12 weeks for plaque psoriasis. Safety was assessed through ≤ 324 weeks by monitoring of treatment‑emergent adverse events through the data cutoff date (May 22, 2023). Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients who maintained ≥ 90% or 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100) during LIMMitless and mean improvement in PASI from baseline of the UltIMMa-1/2 study through 252 additional weeks in the LIMMitless study (total of 304 weeks). Missing efficacy data were imputed using modified nonresponder imputation (mNRI), last observation carried forward (LOCF), or observed cases (OC) methodology. Results: A total of 525 patients were randomized to receive risankizumab 150 mg treatment for 52 weeks in the UltlMMa‑1/2 studies and continued open-label risankizumab 150 mg treatment in the LIMMitless OLE study. Risankizumab was well tolerated through ≤ 324 weeks; no new safety concerns were reported in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. At OLE entry, most patients (451, 85.9%) achieved PASI 90; of those, 422 (93.6%) maintained PASI 90 through week 304 by mNRI (LOCF, 92.7%; OC, 93.8%). Of 320 patients (61.0%) who achieved PASI 100 at OLE entry, 209 (65.3%) maintained PASI 100 through week 304 by mNRI (LOCF, 80.6%; OC, 79.9%). Mean PASI improvement from baseline was generally consistent from OLE entry (95.6% for both LOCF and OC) through week 304 (LOCF, 95.9%; OC, 96.5%). Conclusion: In this 304-week interim analysis of continuous risankizumab treatment, the safety profile was consistent with previous interim analyses from the LIMMitless study. With continuous risankizumab treatment, most patients maintained PASI 90 or PASI 100 responses from OLE entry through 252 additional weeks in the LIMMitless study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207