Parallel Neural Network Structures for Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimation in Optical Fiber Communication Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes two novel neural network (NN) structures to estimate long-term steady linear and nonlinear signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) components in optical fiber communication systems. The first proposed structure is a parallel NN-based (ParNN) estimator, which estimates each SNR component using a different NN structure and input feature set. A combination of gated recurrent unit and dense layers is used to estimate the linear SNR component. On the other hand, the nonlinear SNR component is estimated using a combination of convolutional layer with dense layer. The proposed input features of the ParNN estimator are generated solely from the received signal without knowledge of the transmitted signal. These features are formed of the lower quartile, upper quartile, and entropy, which can accurately characterize the behavior of the SNR components by measuring the received signal spread and uncertainty. For further improvement of the ParNN estimator, an additional stage is added to form the proposed enhanced ParNN (EParNN) estimator. This additional stage consists of two feedforward NNs (FFNNs), each with a single dense layer, where the first FFNN is used to estimate the linear SNR component and the second one estimates the nonlinear SNR component. The input of this additional stage is a combination of the input features and output of the ParNN estimator. The computational complexity is derived for the proposed estimators. The training and testing dataset is built from 16-ary quadrature amplitude modulation of a dual-polarization on a wide range of standard single-mode fiber system configurations, e.g., number of wavelength division multiplexing channels, optical launch power, and number of spans. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed ParNN estimator achieves better SNR estimation accuracy with comparable computational complexity compared to the most efficient work in the literature. The proposed ParNN estimator can independently estimate each SNR component, in which the complexity per SNR component is reduced. Moreover, the proposed EParNN estimator improves SNR estimation accuracy compared to the ParNN estimator at the expense of a slight increase in the computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".