La rencontre comme mode de production des connaissances : un colloque de cinéma au Festival international Présence autochtone. Entretien avec André Dudemaine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet entretien revient sur une longue expérience de recherche collaborative dans le domaine émergent du cinéma autochtone : le colloque international Regards autochtones sur les Amériques, tenu depuis 2009 à Montréal et à Kahnawà:ke dans le cadre du Festival international Présence autochtone. L’entretien souligne le rôle du festival dans l’inscription des arts autochtones dans des lieux de légitimation clés de la métropole culturelle qu’est Montréal, puis la discussion se poursuit autour des moments de rencontre qui ont été créés afin de générer des échanges et des savoirs sur le cinéma autochtone à l’échelle locale, continentale et globale. En soi, il vise à dériver des connaissances sur une méthodologie de la recherche collaborative en milieu urbain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".