Spatial proteo-transcriptomic profiling reveals the molecular landscape of borderline ovarian tumors and their invasive progression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Serous borderline tumors (SBT) are epithelial neoplastic lesions of the ovaries that commonly have a good prognosis. In 10-15% of cases, however, SBT will recur as low-grade serous cancer (LGSC), which is deeply invasive and responds poorly to current standard chemotherapy 1,2,3 . While genetic alterations suggest a common origin, the transition from SBT to LGSC remains poorly understood 4 . Here, we integrate spatial proteomics 5 with spatial transcriptomics to elucidate the evolution from SBT to LGSC and its corresponding metastasis at the molecular level in both the stroma and the tumor. We show that the transition of SBT to LGSC occurs in the epithelial compartment through an intermediary stage with micropapillary features (SBT-MP), which involves a gradual increase in MAPK signaling. A distinct subset of proteins and transcripts was associated with the transition to invasive tumor growth, including the neuronal splicing factor NOVA2, which was limited to expression in LGSC and its corresponding metastasis. An integrative pathway analysis exposed aberrant molecular signaling of tumor cells supported by alterations in angiogenesis and inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Integration of spatial transcriptomics and proteomics followed by knockdown of the most altered genes or pharmaceutical inhibition of the most relevant targets confirmed their functional significance in regulating key features of invasiveness. Combining cell-type resolved spatial proteomics and transcriptomics allowed us to elucidate the sequence of tumorigenesis from SBT to LGSC. The approach presented here is a blueprint to systematically elucidate mechanisms of tumorigenesis and find novel treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".