MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388648711 · doi:10.1101/2023.11.13.23298482

Connectome reorganization associated with temporal lobe pathology and its surgical resection

2023· preprint· en· W4388648711 on OpenAlexafffund
Sara Larivière, Bo‐yong Park, Jessica Royer, Jordan DeKraker, Alexander Ngo, Ella Sahlas, Judy Chen, Raúl Rodríguez‐Cruces, Yifei Weng, Birgit Frauscher, Ruoting Liu, Zhengge Wang, Golia Shafiei, Bratislav Mišić, Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi, Michael Fox, Zhiqiang Zhang, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionNational Science FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaInstitute for Basic ScienceCentre Azrieli de recherche sur l'autisme, Institut et Hôpital Neurologiques de MontréalHospital for Sick ChildrenNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanada Research ChairsChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationInha UniversityNational Research Foundation
KeywordsConnectomeTemporal lobeNeurosciencePsychologyElectrocorticographyTractographyDiffusion MRIEpilepsyMedicineNeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Network neuroscience offers a unique framework to understand the organizational principles of the human brain. Despite recent progress, our understanding of how the brain is modulated by focal lesions remains incomplete. Resection of the temporal lobe is the most effective treatment to control seizures in pharmaco-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), making this syndrome a powerful model to study lesional effects on network organization in young and middle-aged adults. Here, we assessed the downstream consequences of a focal lesion and its surgical resection on the brain’s structural connectome, and explored how this reorganization relates to clinical variables at the individual patient level. We included adults with pharmaco-resistant TLE ( n = 37) who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy between two imaging time points, as well as age-and sex-matched healthy controls who underwent comparable imaging ( n = 31). Core to our analysis was the projection of high-dimensional structural connectome data—derived from diffusion MRI tractography from each subject—into lower-dimensional gradients. We then compared connectome gradients in patients relative to controls before surgery, tracked surgically-induced connectome reconfiguration from pre-to postoperative time points, and examined associations to patient-specific clinical and imaging phenotypes. Before surgery, TLE presented with marked connectome changes in bilateral temporo-parietal regions, reflecting an increased segregation of the ipsilateral anterior temporal lobe from the rest of the brain. Surgery-induced connectome reorganization was localized to this temporo-parietal subnetwork, but primarily involved postoperative integration of contralateral regions with the rest of the brain. Using a partial least-squares analysis, we uncovered a latent clinical-imaging signature underlying this pre-to postoperative connectome reorganization, showing that patients who displayed postoperative integration in bilateral fronto-occipital cortices also had greater preoperative ipsilateral hippocampal atrophy, lower seizure frequency, and secondarily generalized seizures. Our results bridge the effects of focal brain lesions and their surgical resections with large-scale network reorganization and inter-individual clinical variability, thus offering new avenues to examine the fundamental malleability of the human brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→