Review of: "Significance and its role in the historical constitution and transformation of social reality. A conceptual approach from enactive cognition"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.This is a thorough, scholarly, theoretical essay investigating the 4E enactive cognition paradigm as a means of accounting for the production of subjective meanings that emerge from action.The thrust of the argument presents a biological/psychological lineage of subjectivity as an antidote to the constructionist view of culture as the primary determinant of social reality.The thesis states that the cognition-action relationship, although always subjective, can occur in participation.However, the core of the enactivist position is grounded in individual action as producer of social reality: 'actions of individuals give rise to, establish, and transform social structures' and further 'cognition as a sensory-motor bodily action'.There is, therefore, no separation between body, mind, and environment in enactive cognition.Agency is the counterweight to the biological determinism which the author asserts has held sway historically in academic circles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".