MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388665634 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347122

Beyond<i>Gaia</i>DR3: Tracing the [<i>α</i>/M] – [M/H] bimodality from the inner to the outer Milky Way disc with<i>Gaia</i>-RVS and convolutional neural networks

2023· article· en· W4388665634 on OpenAlexaff
G. Guiglion, S. Nepal, C. Chiappini, Sergey Khoperskov, G. Traven, A. B. A. Queiroz, Matthias Steinmetz, M. Valentini, Y. Fournier, A. Vallenari, K. Youakim, M. Bergemann, Szabolcs Mészáros, S. Lucatello, R. Sordo, S. Fabbro, Ivan Minchev, G. Tautvaiśienė, Š. Mikolaitis, J. Montalbán

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMilky WayAstrophysicsBimodalityTracingAstronomyStarsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. In June 2022, Gaia DR3 provided the astronomy community with about one million spectra from the Radial Velocity Spectrometer (RVS) covering the CaII triplet region. In the next Gaia data releases, we anticipate the number of RVS spectra to successively increase from several 10 million spectra to eventually more than 200 million spectra. Thus, stellar spectra are projected to be produced on an ‘industrial scale’, with numbers well above those for current and anticipated ground-based surveys. However, one-third of the published spectra have 15 ≤ S /N ≤ 25 per pixel such that they pose problems for classical spectral analysis pipelines, and therefore, alternative ways to tap into these large datasets need to be devised. Aims. We aim to leverage the versatility and capabilities of machine learning techniques for supercharged stellar parametrisation by combining Gaia -RVS spectra with the full set of Gaia products and high-resolution, high-quality ground-based spectroscopic reference datasets. Methods. We developed a hybrid convolutional neural network (CNN) that combines the Gaia DR3 RVS spectra, photometry (G, G_BP, G_RP), parallaxes, and XP coefficients to derive atmospheric parameters ( T eff , log(g) as well as overall [M/H]) and chemical abundances ([Fe/H] and [ α /M]). We trained the CNN with a high-quality training sample based on APOGEE DR17 labels. Results. With this CNN, we derived homogeneous atmospheric parameters and abundances for 886 080 RVS stars that show remarkable precision and accuracy compared to external datasets (such as GALAH and asteroseismology). The CNN is robust against noise in the RVS data, and we derive very precise labels down to S/N =15. We managed to characterise the [ α /M] - [M/H] bimodality from the inner regions to the outer parts of the Milky Way, which has never been done using RVS spectra or similar datasets. Conclusions. This work is the first to combine machine learning with such diverse datasets and paves the way for large-scale machine learning analysis of Gaia -RVS spectra from future data releases. Large, high-quality datasets can be optimally combined thanks to the CNN, thereby realising the full power of spectroscopy, astrometry, and photometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→