IMPRESSÃO ERRADA: CRIS PERES NO ACERVO DA PINACOTECA DA UFPB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A presença de trabalhos com autoria de mulheres artistas no acervo da Pinacoteca da UFPB é quantitativamente inferior aos marcadores dos artistas homens.O presente artigo dedicouse a analisar o trabalho intitulado "Impressão errada" (2019) da artista paraibana Cris Peres, que reflete sobre a relação entre arte e vida, a partir da integração com a linguagem artística da gravura contemporânea, inserida no catálogo da Pinacoteca da UFPB, publicado em 2021.A escolha deste recorte reafirma a importância de sinalizar trabalhos de mulheres artistas em coleções públicas de artes visuais.Utilizamos pesquisa documental e qualitativa por meio do estudo de caso Minayo (2001) e Yin (2005), com enfoque feminista.Os recursos metodológicos delinearam os percursos da obra estudada no acervo catalogado da Pinacoteca da UFPB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".