LITERATUR REVIEW: PENGARUH SCREEN TIME TERHADAP MASALAH PERILAKU ANAK
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Technological developments and easy access to digital devices cause excessive screen time in children. Excessive screen time in children can cause various problems in children. This review aimed to examine the association between screen time and behavioral problems of children. Methods: Three databases were searched, including ScienceDirect, Medline/Pubmed, and Google Scholar databases. Articles were selected using inclusion criteria, namely articles that have been limited since the last five years (2019-2023), are pure research articles, full text, and in English. Results: Eight articles were included in this review. The research was conducted in 8 countries namely Spain, Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United States, Canada, and Israel with an age range from 1-18 years. Research instruments used to measure behavioral problems in children vary. Conclusion: This review identified that there is a relationship between increased screen time and increased behavior problems in children. Keywords: behavior problem; children; screen time
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it