MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388671709 · doi:10.1002/prp2.1151

Effects of the <scp>HIV</scp>‐1 maturation inhibitor <scp>GSK3640254</scp> on <scp>QT</scp> interval in healthy participants

2023· article· en· W4388671709 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Zhang, Mark Bush, Parto Yazdani, Joyce Zhan, Bo Wen, Veronica Bainbridge, Brian Wynne, Samit R. Joshi, Max Lataillade

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacology Research & Perspectives · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsGlaxoSmithKline (Canada)
FundersViiV Healthcare
KeywordsQT intervalMoxifloxacinPlaceboMedicinePharmacokineticsPharmacologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaAntibioticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract GSK3640254 (GSK'254) is a novel HIV‐1 maturation inhibitor with pharmacokinetics supporting once‐daily (QD) therapy for HIV‐1 treatment. This thorough QT/corrected QT (QTc) study evaluated the effect of GSK'254 on cardiac repolarization. In this two‐part, randomized study, healthy participants received GSK'254 or placebo QD for 7 days (part 1) to determine safety and pharmacokinetics of a 500‐mg supratherapeutic dose. Four sequential treatment periods composed the main QTc study (part 2): GSK'254 100 mg, GSK'254 500 mg, placebo QD for 7 days, or placebo QD for 6 days with a 400‐mg moxifloxacin dose on Day 7 (all with a moderate‐fat meal). Concentration‐QTc analyses modeled the relationship between GSK'254 plasma concentrations and placebo‐adjusted change from baseline in QT interval corrected with Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF). Of 50 participants enrolled, 48 completed the study (part 1, 8/8; part 2, 40/42). Least‐squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF for GSK'254 100 mg followed the placebo pattern across time points (maximum LS mean ΔΔQTcF, 1.7 ms); the upper bound of the 90% CI remained &lt;10 ms. Maximum LS mean ΔΔQTcF for GSK'254 500 mg exceeded the 10‐ms threshold: 10.6 ms (90% CI 7.75–13.38). Neither GSK'254 dose had clinically relevant effects on heart rate or cardiac conduction. By concentration‐QTc analysis, no effect on ΔΔQTcF &gt;10 ms is expected up to GSK'254 concentrations of ~3070 ng mL −1 . No clinically relevant effects on cardiac parameters were seen in healthy participants with GSK'254 at the 100‐mg dose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacology Research & PerspectivesSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207