MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388676663 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2023.3332509

Community Detection-Empowered Self-Adaptive Network Slicing in Multi-Tier Edge-Cloud System

2023· article· en· W4388676663 on OpenAlex
Chenjing Tian, Haotong Cao, Jun Xie, Sahil Garg, Mubarak Alrashoud, Prayag Tiwari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLoad balancing (electrical power)Distributed computingQuality of serviceProvisioningCloud computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network slicing (NS) is a highly promising paradigm in 5G and forthcoming 6G communication networks. NS allows for the customization of multiple logically independent network slices to provide tailored service for vertical applications with diverse quality of service (QoS) requirements. However, current research on NS primarily relies on the traditional modeling methods such as service function chaining (SFC) and task offloading, which have limitations in adapting to the evolving scenarios in 5G/6G networks. To address this, our study introduces one novel Self-adaptive Network Slicing (SNS) modeling method. In this approach, each service is abstracted as multiple SFC replicas originating from diverse access points. Based on the SNS modeling, we investigate a VNF configuration and flow routing (VCFR) problem for service provisioning in a multi-tier system. With the objective of achieving load-balancing with minimal slice operational expenditure, we formulate the VCFR as a mixed-integer linear programming. However, deriving an exact solution via MILP is computationally expensive due to its NP-hardness. To reduce computational complexity, we propose one Load Balancing-considered Community Detection-based Heuristic (LBCD-Heu), our divide and conquer approach, to solve the problem. In LBCD-Heu, we first design a load balancing-considered community detection method to divide the substrate multi-tier network into multiple independent communities. Following this, the MILP is employed in each community to obtain a near-optimal solution. Extensive evaluations justify that LBCD-Heu can effectively reduce the service operational cost and algorithm run-time while ensuring the load balancing of substrate network. Additionally, our results verify that the SNS modeling enables the provision of services at lower expenditures compared with traditional modeling methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it