MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388678284 · doi:10.29327/268346.7.15-15

TEORIA CRÍTICA DA TECNOLOGIA EM ANDREW FEENBERG contribuições ao ensino de história em tempos de pós-pandemia

2023· article· pt· W4388678284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Communitas · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicBig Data and Digital Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O prestigiado filósofo americano Andrew Feenberg é professor do departamento de Filosofia da Tecnologia da Universidade Simon Fraser em Vancouver (Canadá), e dedica seus estudos em áreas como a Filosofia da Tecnologia e a crítica da tecnologia. Suas produções científicas nos convidam ao desenvolvimento da autorreflexão, de um olhar crítico, para superar ideias conformistas de que as tecnologias são neutras, sendo necessário historicizá-las. Não há neutralidade nas tecnologias, e sim todo um discurso excludente que corrobora com princípios antidemocráticos, de poder e controle social.  O presente artigo estabelece uma relação com as características da Teoria Crítica da Tecnologia de Feenberg com o ensino de história, mapeando contribuições à área.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it