TEORIA CRÍTICA DA TECNOLOGIA EM ANDREW FEENBERG contribuições ao ensino de história em tempos de pós-pandemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O prestigiado filósofo americano Andrew Feenberg é professor do departamento de Filosofia da Tecnologia da Universidade Simon Fraser em Vancouver (Canadá), e dedica seus estudos em áreas como a Filosofia da Tecnologia e a crítica da tecnologia. Suas produções científicas nos convidam ao desenvolvimento da autorreflexão, de um olhar crítico, para superar ideias conformistas de que as tecnologias são neutras, sendo necessário historicizá-las. Não há neutralidade nas tecnologias, e sim todo um discurso excludente que corrobora com princípios antidemocráticos, de poder e controle social. O presente artigo estabelece uma relação com as características da Teoria Crítica da Tecnologia de Feenberg com o ensino de história, mapeando contribuições à área.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".