Rencana Tapak (Siteplan) sebagai Persyaratan Mutlak Penerbitan Persetujuan Bangunan Gedung (PBG) di Kabupaten Tangerang (Studi Kasus: Proses Permohonan Siteplan (Rencana Tapak) Lapangan Basket)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The planning stage in project management is indispensable, where the planning contains technical and non-technical plans for a construction project to be executed (Executing). Planning has an important role so that the construction project will be carried out in accordance with the initiation set by the owner, and the building being built does not violate the rules set by the Regional Government at the location where the building will be erected. Site plan (Site plan) plays an important role in the planning stage. The site plan (Site plan) contains information regarding the direction of land use to be erected by the executor of the building construction. The information contained in the Site Plan includes: Percentage of land area that can be utilized for constructing buildings, Boundary Lines of Buildings to Roads, Building Height Limits, directions for providing Green Open Spaces (RTH) which function as water catchments, modeling of access in and out of land to be used. With the existence of a site plan, the building designed by the architect will be more organized in accordance with the applicable Tangerang Regency Spatial Planning Regulations. A site plan that has been approved by the Regional Government of Tangerang Regency is an important document and an absolute requirement for obtaining a Building Approval (PBG).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.162 | 0.061 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".