Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Spectroscopic analysis of Ly α damping wings of bright sources at z > 6 is a promising way to measure the reionization history of the universe. However, the theoretical interpretation of the damping wings is challenging due to the inhomogeneous nature of the reionization process and the proximity effect of bright sources. In this Letter, we analyse the damping wings arising from the neutral patches in the radiative transfer cosmological simulation suite cosmic reionization on computers. We find that the damping wing profile remains a tight function of volume-weighted neutral fraction v, especially when v > 0.5, despite the patchy nature of reionization and the proximity effect. This small scatter indicates that with a well-measured damping wing profile, we could constrain the volume-weighted neutral fraction as precise as Δ v ≲ 0.1 in the first half of reionization. Due to resonant Ly α absorption from the residual neutral hydrogen inside the ionized bubble, it may be challenging to find the starting point of the damping wing for faint sources like normal galaxies or gamma-ray bursts. However, for bright sources like quasars, it is hopeful to measure the entire damping wing and use them to measure the neutral fraction accurately.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".