Spatial and Dosimetric accuracy of 3D polymer gel with CBCT readout - Varian HyperArc® SRS implementation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract 3D polymer gel dosimetry is a promising means to verify complex radiation treatments such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), as it provides both 3D dosimetric and spatial information. The purpose of the study is to use a polymer gel read-out with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to commission Varian’s HyperArc ® -treatment planning and delivery. Three targets (3 cm, 2 cm, 1 cm diameter respectively) were defined on a treatment plan with a maximum dose of 25 Gy, resembling a single isocentre, multiple-lesion SRS plan. Pre- and post-irradiation CBCT images of the gel were obtained for dosimetry analysis. One slice containing two large targets was used to self-calibrate the entire gel volume for dose comparison. We were able to achieve sub-millimeter spatial accuracy and all evaluated gamma criterion (5% 1mm, 3% 1mm, 2% 1 mm were > 95%). In summary, in this study we have demonstrated that CBCT polymer gel dosimetry can be a highly valuable tool for commissioning complex radiation treatment techniques such as SRS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".