MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388700037 · doi:10.7866/hpe-rpe.23.1.4

The Case for Uniform Commodity Taxation: A Tax Reform Approach

2023· article· en· W4388700037 on OpenAlexaff
Robin Boadway, Katherine Cuff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Hacienda Pública Española · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsCommodityIncome taxPareto principleUnemploymentDifferential (mechanical device)Tax reformMicroeconomicsLabour economicsMacroeconomicsPublic economicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalizing the tax reform approach of Laroque (2005), Kaplow (2006) and Hellwig (2009), we show that for any arbitrary income tax system differential commodity taxation can be Pareto-dominated by a uniform rate with a suitably reformed income tax. Under particular preference specifications, we derive the explicit income tax reforms required in an representative-agent economy and when there is linear progressive, piecewise linear and nonlinear income taxation. Optimal uniform commodity results of Sandmo (1974), Atkinson and Stiglitz (1976) and Deaton (1979) apply with involuntary unemployment and when individuals differ in preferences for leisure and make extensive labour supply decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Hacienda Pública EspañolaSame topicFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207