MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388703337 · doi:10.1177/14604086231198764

A 10-year review of pain management practices for rib fractures at a lead trauma hospital: Are we adopting all multimodal pain management strategies?

2023· review· en· W4388703337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrauma · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma Management and Diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Armed ForcesSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFlail chestMultimodal therapyAcetaminophenPain managementAnesthesiaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Rib fractures lead to altered breathing mechanics, impaired gas exchange, and in some patients to respiratory failure. Multimodal analgesia has become one of the pillars of management; however, barriers toward widespread adoption remain. We reviewed the trends in multimodal pain management strategies and their drivers over a 10-year period at a lead trauma hospital in Canada. Methods This is a cross-sectional study in which demographic, injury, pharmacological, as well as outcome data were collected for all adult patients admitted with rib fractures. Data were collected retrospectively and the study period was divided into three eras (2011–2014; 2015–2018; 2019–2022). Multimodal pain management was defined as either patient-controlled (PCA) or regional analgesia (epidural or continuous plane block) in combination with acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). All patients received pro re nata (PRN) narcotics. Data were stratified based on rib fracture severity, age, and intubation on arrival. Results We identified 2586 patients with rib fractures (mild non-flail 32.6%; moderate non-flail 50.2%; flail 17.2%). The use of standing acetaminophen and NSAIDs increased over time for all groups. Regional analgesia use increased while PCA use reduced, particularly in the flail group. Only 7% of flail patients intubated on arrival received regional analgesia. Among those not intubated on arrival, only 35% of flail and 23% of non-flail patients received multimodal pain management. Over time, multimodal pain management decreased in the non-flail group due to a reduction in PCA use without an equal rise in regional anesthesia. Those without multimodal pain management were older and the mechanism of injury was more likely a fall. Among those with a flail, who were non-intubated at presentation, only 31% of those aged >65 received multimodal pain regimens compared to 45% in those ≤65y. Conclusions Although multimodal pain management strategies have improved over time, a large proportion of patients, even among those with flail chest, still do not receive multimodal pain management. Elderly patients, at highest risk of adverse outcomes, were less likely to receive multimodal pain management strategies and should be the target of performance improvement initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it