ANALYSIS OF MAIN DEMOGRAPHIC AND PROFESSIONAL INDICATORS RELATED TO THE ACTIVITIES OF MEDICAL ASSISTANTS WORKING IN THE CENTERS FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The presented article aims to determine the main demographic and professional indicators related to the activities of medical assistants working in emergency medical care in the Republic of Bulgaria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this regard, scientific developments, reports and publications of researchers and experts in this field were studied and analyzed. A survey was conducted through an interview and a direct anonymous survey in the first quarter of 2019 with 325 respondents. RESULTS: The problems and the current state of the work of the medical assistants working in emergency medical care are the subject of lively discussions on a global and national scale. This emphasized interest and attention stems from the global issues that are the subject of their work. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent measures are needed to attract young medical assistants to work in emergency medical centers, to provide a sufficient number of medical specialists in the teams, to increase salaries, to provide modern medical equipment, to introduce telemedicine, etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.034 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".