MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388706199 · doi:10.1121/10.0022351

Quantitative osteoporosis diagnosis of porous cancellous bone using poroelastodynamic modal analysis

2023· article· en· W4388706199 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hodaei, Andreas Mandelis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisCancellous boneMaterials scienceStiffnessPorosityBone mineralComposite materialMedicineAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease characterized by reduced bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, leading to increased fragility. This study presents a novel three-dimensional poroelastodynamic model for analyzing cancellous bone free vibration responses. The model incorporates the Navier-Stokes equations of linear elasticity and the Biot theory of porous media, allowing the investigation of osteoporosis-related changes. The analysis considers parameters like porosity, density, elasticity, Poisson ratio, and viscosity of bone marrow within the porous medium. Our findings indicate that natural frequencies of cancellous bone play a crucial role in osteoporosis prediction. By incorporating experimental data from 12 mouse femurs, we unveil insights into osteoporosis prediction. Increased porosity reduces bone stiffness, lowering natural frequencies. However, it also increases bone mass loss relative to stiffness, leading to higher frequencies. Therefore, the natural frequencies of osteoporotic bone are always higher than the natural frequencies of normal bone. Additionally, an increase in bone marrow within the pores, while increasing damping effects, also increases natural frequencies, which is another indication of osteoporosis growth in bone. The presence of bone marrow within the pores further influences natural frequencies, providing additional insights into osteoporosis growth. Thinner and smaller bones are found to be more susceptible to osteoporosis compared to larger and bigger bones due to their higher natural frequencies at equivalent porosity levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207