MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388707350 · doi:10.59295/sum4(174)2023_05

Bessarabian orthodoxy during Antonescu’s rule (1941-1944)

2023· article· en· W4388707350 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian Nicolae Petcu

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Universitatis Moldaviae Seria Ştiinţe Umanistice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthodoxyBishopsRomanianContext (archaeology)Exposition (narrative)Administration (probate law)State (computer science)Political sciencePeriod (music)Action (physics)LawHistorySociologyPublic administrationArtPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the liberation of Bessarabia from Soviet occupation, as in the case of northern Bukovina, the Romanian head of state ordered a separate organization from the rest of the country for the purpose of a more efficient administration of the two Romanian provinces. Ion Antonescu was deeply involved in the church organization, considering initiatives such as: the abolition of the Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and the Faculty of Theology in Chisinau, the recruitment of clerical staff with missionary zeal, the election of other bishops or the rally of ecclesiastical authorities to the action of administrative reform and social of the province. How much the Antonescu authorities succeeded in all this is a question to which we will try to find an answer through our exposition based on sources of unpublished and memorial archives and de secular and church press of that period, all in an interdisciplinary in the context epoch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Universitatis Moldaviae Seria Ştiinţe UmanisticeSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207