MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388709812 · doi:10.61838/kman.psych.1

Divorce Counseling

2022· book· en· W4388709812 on OpenAlexaff
Kamdin Parsakia, Seyed Ali Darbani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMarriage and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmony (color)PsychologySyllabusSubstance abuseSexual abuseAge at first marriageDemographySocial psychologyMedicineSociologyPsychiatrySuicide preventionPopulationPoison controlPedagogyFertility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following is a summary of a book about divorce counseling. Although divorce rates have increased from 1990 to the present day, there has been a significant decrease in divorce rates for women over 35 years old worldwide. Currently, the average age of marriage for women is 28 and for men is 30, and although couples may be more prepared for married life at a later age, marriage at a younger age is recommended. The probability of divorce is also higher in the first four years of marriage. Unrealistic expectations of the spouses about themselves and their relationship can be one of the main causes of divorce, as well as sexual problems, financial issues, infidelity, substance abuse, physical abuse, and lack of effective communication and harmony in married life. This book attempts to provide useful information on the introduction, prevention, and influential factors of divorce using current sources and articles in this field. The presented topics are also in line with academic syllabuses that can be beneficial for students and professors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1650.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarriage and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207