Usos y costumbres en las comunidades indígenas bajo la teoría del Neoconstitucionalismo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En la teoría jurídica contemporánea, la configuración constitucional estructura la plataforma para la garantía de los derechos y libertades. Así, la norma constitucional mexicana, contiene supuestos jurídicos que resultan en la práctica excluyentes entre sí, circunstancia que implica prever a un mismo nivel constitucional una contradicción, lo cual trae consigo un sincretismo metodológico, constitucional e incluso teórico. Es finalidad del presente trabajo no solo el denunciar la contradicción, sino demostrar que la constitución mexicana en su contexto, requiere integrar una coherencia interna tomando como referencia el principio de igualdad en la definición y reconocimiento del derecho indígena basado en los usos y costumbres y el derecho positivo, así como describir el pluralismo jurídico nacional, aplicados ambos conceptos a dos casos paradigmáticos en el Municipio de Amealco de Bonfil, en Querétaro: Macedonia Blas y Alberta Alcántara y Teresa González.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".