MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388711848 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggad448

Crustal structure of onshore-offshore Atlantic Canada and environs from constrained 3-D gravity inversion using variable mesh depths

2023· article· en· W4388711848 on OpenAlexafffundabout
J. Kim Welford

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsGeologyInversion (geology)RiftSubmarine pipelineTectonicsSeismologyGeophysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Atlantic Canada encompasses geological evidence of the orogenic and rifting episodes that inspired the development of the theory of plate tectonics and the fundamental concept of the Wilson cycle. To provide a regional crustal-scale view that can complement surface mapping studies and sparse seismological investigations, an onshore–offshore 3-D constrained gravity inversion methodology is proposed involving incorporation of topography and an inversion mesh that is laterally variable in terms of its maximum depth extent. A 3-D density anomaly model for the entirety of Atlantic Canada and its environs is generated, with the inverted density distribution structure and extracted isodensity surfaces showing excellent correspondence with independent and co-located controlled source and passive seismic constraints. The full density model and crustal thicknesses from this work are made freely available so that they may be used for further study, for instance as inputs for deformable plate reconstruction modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207