MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388713049 · doi:10.23977/acss.2023.070908

A review of machine learning-based prediction of lncRNA subcellular localization

2023· review· en· W4388713049 on OpenAlex
Xi Deng, Lin Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Computer Signals and Systems · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYunnan Normal University
KeywordsSubcellular localizationComputer scienceField (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceComputational biologyMachine learningBiologyCell biologyCytoplasmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous development of the field of bioinformatics, the subcellular localization of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has become a highly prominent frontier. LncRNAs play crucial regulatory roles in cellular processes, and understanding their subcellular localization is essential for comprehending their functions and mechanisms. However, traditional experimental methods face challenges of high costs and time consumption when predicting the subcellular localization of lncRNAs on a large scale, which has led to the emergence of research methods based on machine learning. This review aims to recap the latest advancements and trends in machine learning-based prediction of lncRNA subcellular localization in recent years. It not only provides new opportunities for a better understanding of lncRNA functions and cellular processes but also propels advancements in the fields of bioinformatics and molecular biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it