MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388716981 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2023-0917

White and Jakiela reply

2023· letter· en· W4388716981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel K. White, Jason T. Jakiela

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllianceResource (disambiguation)White paperWhite (mutation)RegretGerontologyMedicinePsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: We would like to thank Dr. Fallon and coauthors1 for their thoughtful comments on our review,2 and we completely agree with all the points made. We regret our omission of the important work the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Osteoarthritis Action Alliance, the Arthritis Foundation, and others perform on a daily basis to ease the burden of osteoarthritis (OA) for the millions of adults with this chronic long-term disease. The healthcare provider (HCP) resource tables1 provided are an especially rich resource for patients and … Address correspondence to D.K. White, 540 S. College Ave 210L, Newark, DE 19713, USA. Email: dkw{at}udel.edu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0360.036
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→