MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388719891 · doi:10.1370/afm.22.s1.5174

Facilitators and Challenges Emerging from Primary Care Teams’ Engagement in COVID-19 Vaccination Distribution in Ontario, Can

2023· article· en· W4388719891 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachelle Ashcroft, Simon Lam, Connor Kemp, Judith K. Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)VaccinationFocus groupPrimary carePandemicDiversity (politics)NursingHealth careDistribution (mathematics)MedicineFamily medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyBusinessPolitical scienceGeographyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Primary care has historically established itself as an important part of vaccinations efforts due to its successful delivery of flu and childhood immunisation programmes centred on counselling and strong infrastructure. An effective and efficient distribution of a vaccine was essential for the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Although primary care teams contributed to all phases of the COVID-19 vaccination distribution, involvement of primary care teams in Ontario, Canada has been inconsistent. Criticisms have emerged regarding the limited utilization of the expertise primary care in informing and guiding implementation of vaccinations. An increased understanding of the role primary care teams had in the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines in Ontario will help determine the unique experiences of interprofessional primary care providers. Objective: To identify facilitators and challenges of integrating COVID-19 vaccination in interprofessional primary health care teams across Ontario. Study Design: Descriptive, qualitative focus groups conducted with interprofessional primary care providers and staff in Ontario. Results: We conducted 8 focus groups with 39 participants representing geographic diversity across Ontario. Participants reflected a range of clinical, administrative, and leadership roles. Three themes were identified as facilitators: i) primary care knows patients; ii) team capacity for vaccination, iii) intersectoral collaborations, and three themes identified challenges including: i) operational challenges, ii) impact on routine patient care, and iii) primary care being overlooked. Participants noted the importance of supporting provider well-being during a busy period of managing competing health needs of patients. In addition, many primary care teams either strengthened existing partnerships or collaborated with new stakeholders which was seen as important to maintain after the COVID-19 vaccinations. Conclusions: Primary care teams played a crucial role in supporting COVID-19 vaccinations in Ontario. Future vaccination efforts will benefit from the inclusion and involvement of primary care from the beginning to guide decision-making, along with additional resourcing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→French-language works237,207→