MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388726060 · doi:10.4000/rief.10654

Nanon de George Sand, ou le roman de formation d’une paysanne

2023· article· fr· W4388726060 on OpenAlexaff
Agnese Silvestri

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue italienne d’études françaises · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanon (1872) constitue une triple exception par rapport au roman de formation qui compte surtout des héros masculins et bourgeois et qui, en France au XIXe siècle, prend des formes caractérisées par la déception. Au contraire, Sand met ici en scène un personnage féminin et appartenant à la paysannerie. Par rapport à la morphologie de ce sous-genre, la trajectoire de sa petite analphabète qui, dans la tourmente de 1789, apprend à lire, devient propriétaire et épouse un aristocrate sans jamais renoncer à sa cornette campagnarde, est heureuse et exemplaire. Cet article essaie donc d’identifier quel type de socialisation Sand propose aux femmes relativement à l’expérience de l’Histoire, à celle du travail, et aux possibilités de parvenir dans la nation postrévolutionnaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue italienne d’études françaisesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207