Data-Driven Internal Model Learning Control for Nonlinear Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel data-driven internal model learning control (DIMLC) strategy is developed for a nonlinear nonaffine system subject to unknown nonrepetitive uncertainties. At first, an iterative dynamic linearization (IDL) approach is employed for reformulating the nonlinear plant to an iterative linear data model (iLDM). Then, the nominal form of the IDL-based iLDM is used as an internal model of the nonlinear plant whose parameters are estimated by an iterative adaptive updating mechanism using only input-output (I/O) data. The equivalent feedback-principle-based internal model inversion is further applied to the subsequent controller design and analysis. The proposed DIMLC contains two parts. One is a nominal controller designed by the inversion of the internal model which achieves a perfect tracking of the target output; the other is a compensatory controller which offsets the uncertainties. The novel DIMLC is data-driven and does not require an explicit model. It can deal with model-plant mismatch and disturbances, enhancing the robustness against uncertainties. The theoretical results are verified by simulation study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it