MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388727022 · doi:10.4000/rief.11419

Femmes au miroir. Dramaturgies du Bal

2023· article· fr· W4388727022 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Grazia Porcelli

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue italienne d’études françaises · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article analyse les mises en scène du Bal, écrit par Némirovsky entre un chapitre et l’autre de David Golder, avec lequel il présente quelques points communs, à commencer par la représentation d’une famille juive. Comme le suggère le titre, tout tourne autour du bal qui aurait dû consacrer les aspirations de la famille, mais qui va précipiter, au contraire, sa défaite sociale. Il s’agit d’un texte dans lequel la théâtralité potentielle des textes de Némirovsky s’avère particulièrement évidente, en témoigne la présence de certains effets théâtraux, tels que des phrases qui tiennent lieu de didascalies. Après une brève observation de la mise en scène de Lemoine en 2013, dans laquelle prédominent les aspects comico-grotesques, l’article se penche sur la mise en scène de Bergamasco en 2015, où l’accent est mis sur la violence des sentiments et de la rivalité mère-fille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue italienne d’études françaisesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207