MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388735243 · doi:10.1021/mc-2023-vol58.ch14

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF MACHINE LEARNING FOR ANTI-INFECTIVE DRUG DISCOVERY

2023· book-chapter· en· W4388735243 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nishant Sarkar, Jonathan Stokes

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicinal chemistry reviews · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Structural Characterization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceSocial mediaAltmetricsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO BOOKPREVChapterNEXTPRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF MACHINE LEARNING FOR ANTI-INFECTIVE DRUG DISCOVERYNishant SarkarNishant SarkarDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, and David Braley Centre for Antibiotic Discovery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaMore by Nishant Sarkar and Jonathan M. StokesJonathan M. StokesDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, and David Braley Centre for Antibiotic Discovery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaMore by Jonathan M. StokesDOI: 10.1021/mc-2023-vol58.ch14Publication Date (Web):November 16, 2023Publication History Published online16 November 2023Request reuse permissions Copyright © 2023 MEDI, Inc. Published by American Chemical Society.2023 Medicinal Chemistry ReviewsChapter 14pp 345-375Medicinal Chemistry ReviewsVol. 58ISBN13: 9781734427462eISBN: 9781734427462Article Views72Altmetric-Citations-LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit Read OnlinePDF (2 MB) Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinal chemistry reviewsSame topicBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207