MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388735993 · doi:10.1370/afm.22.s1.5530

Factors Influencing Care Trajectories for Common Mental Disorders related sick leave : Patients’ Experience in Primary Care

2023· article· en· W4388735993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Justine Labourot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSick leavePsychosocialPsychological interventionContext (archaeology)Mental healthMedicineFamily medicineHealth careOpenness to experienceNursingPsychologyPsychiatryPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Common mental health disorders (CMDs) represent up to 30% of all sick leave requests in 2013, with 25% lasting over 6 months. In Canada, family physicians serve as the main prescribers of sick leave and coordinate the necessary psychosocial and rehabilitation services for recovery and return to work (RTW). However, limited access to family physicians, their isolated practices, and time and knowledge constraints can impede effective patient sick leave management. Coupled with restricted service access, income disparities, and insurance coverage variations, this leads to trajectory variability, hindering optimal care establishment and creating patient inequity, ultimately undermining universal service quality. Objective: Describe patients’ perspectives of the factors having influenced their mental health-related sick leave trajectories and their access to primary care mental health and RTW services. Methods: A descriptive qualitative research design was used. Semi-structured individual interviews of approximately 60 minutes were conducted with 14 participants on a videoconference platform. Transcriptions were analyzed using Conventional content analysis. Setting: Participants were recruited mostly from the Montreal region in Quebec, Canada, were all followed by a family physician during their sick leave and had various access to insurance coverage. Results: Six themes describing the main factors influencing care trajectory were identified : 1) fragmented interventions provided by family physicians; 2) patients’ autonomy in managing their own care trajectory; 3) The attitude and case management provided by the insurer; 4) duration and ill-adapted intervention approaches of the Employee and Family Assistance Programs; 5) employer’s openness and understanding; and 6) match between the person’s needs and their ability to access psychosocial and rehabilitation services. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize crucial gaps in collaborative practices surrounding management of mental health-related sick leave. Strengthening coordination of these services, including the integration of return-to-work coordinators in primary care, is essential. Occupational therapists in this role could support the family physician in managing the sick leave and RTW, strengthen interprofessional and intersectoral collaboration, and ensure that patients received needed services in a timelier manner regardless of their insurance coverage or financial needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWorkplace Health and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207