MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388735996 · doi:10.1370/afm.22.s1.5087

Development of a university nursing health clinic

2023· article· en· W4388735996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Émilie Hudon, Véronique Dauwe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingContext (archaeology)Agile software developmentHealth careCommunity healthPopulationMedicinePublic healthComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context The university community encompasses diverse characteristics, including various age groups and cultures. Since 2010, the number of international students in Canada has doubled (Yamba et al., 2021). The university’s reality requires expertise in primary care, which is provided by registered nurses (RNs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) specializing in primary health care (PHNs). They contribute to proximity of care by promoting access to health care and services for the university community, including the student community, which is among the clientele that underuse health care system resources (Romo et al., 2019). Furthermore, international students generally do not have access to a family doctor. Thus, it was necessary to make health care and services accessible to our university community through a clinic. Objective, population and setting The objective is to develop and implement the CUSI, a nurse-led clinic, to increase health care access for the entire university community of Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada. The clinic’s mission is threefold: clinical practice, teaching and research. Study The development of the clinic followed the ten steps to setting up a nurse-led clinic (Hatchett, 2008) and the AGILE approach to project development (Cobb, 2011; Project Management Institute, 2018). The AGILE approach facilitates the use of an iterative cycle process in collaboration with the community and partners. It was operated based on the organic nursing model proposed by Contandriopoulos et al. (2017), a hypothetical model which emphasizes intra-professional collaboration and nursing expertise. This model enables the full occupancy of the clinical nurse role through the support of PHNs. Analysis and outcomes measure We analyzed the consultations using quantitative descriptive statistics, including continuous variables (number of consultations and visits with RNs or PHNs, number of medical referrals, number of reserved activities) and categorical variables (number of persons by age group, access to a family doctor). Results The CUSI was opened in February 2023. Half of the university students who visited the CUSI do not have access to a family doctor and are international students. Only 10% of the visits could not be handled exclusively by RNs and PHNs. Conclusions The CUSI was implemented to provide care to university community employees and students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNursing Roles and Practices→French-language works237,207→