Hydrogen Sulfide as a Potential Future Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease, Hyperhomocysteinemia, and Management of Polycystic Kidney Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common global health challenge characterized by irreversible pathological processes that reduce kidney function and culminate in the development of end-stage renal disease. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in addition to increased caregiver burden and higher financial cost. A central player in CKD pathogenesis and progression is renal hypoxia. Renal hypoxia stimulates induction of oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammation, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which in turn promote cellular susceptibility and further aggravate hypoxia, thus forming a pathological vicious cycle in CKD progression. Although the importance of CKD is widely appreciated, including improvements in the quality of existing therapies such as dialysis and transplantation, new therapeutic options are limited, as there is still increased morbidity, mortality, and poor quality of life among CKD patients. Growing evidence indicates that hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), a small gaseous signaling molecule with an obnoxious smell, accumulates in the renal medulla under hypoxic conditions and functions as an oxygen sensor that restores oxygen balance and increases medullary flow. Moreover, plasma H 2 S level has been recently reported to be markedly reduced in CKD patients and animal models. Also, H 2 S has been established to possess potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic properties in several experimental models of kidney diseases, suggesting that its supplementation could protect against CKD and retard its progression. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss current clinical and experimental developments regarding CKD, its pathophysiology, and potential cellular and molecular mechanisms of protection by H 2 S in experimental models of CKD. A section of the chapter also discusses hyperhomocysteinemia and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, which are forms of CKD, and H 2 S as an additional/alternative agent for pharmacological treatment or management of these conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".