MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388740180 · doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3333741

Improved Generalization of Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Manipulation Trajectories

2023· article· en· W4388740180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicArtificial intelligenceGeneralizationTask (project management)Movement (music)Machine learningTrajectoryObject (grammar)Parameterized complexityGRASPPoint (geometry)AlgorithmMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imitation learning methods have proven effective in learning robotic tasks by leveraging multiple human-controlled demonstrations. However, existing approaches often struggle to generalize across a wide range of tasks, such as extrapolating to unseen object locations, incorporating via-point modulation, accurately modeling orientation, handling trajectories with multiple options, and capturing aiming actions. In this study, we propose a novel framework that combines ideas from task-parameterized Gaussian mixture models and probabilistic movement primitives to address these limitations and satisfy all the aforementioned properties within a single framework. We conduct comprehensive evaluations of our approach on four real-life tasks: pick-and-place, water pouring, shooting a hockey puck into a net, and sweeping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it