MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388745596 · doi:10.5376/ija.2023.13.0012

Floodplains Suitability Assessment for Fish Culture in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

2023· article· en· W4388745596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Megerssa Endebu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aquaculture · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFloodplainEnvironmental scienceOverexploitationWater qualityWetlandRift valleyFisheryTurbidityOreochromisWet seasonTilapiaPlanktonFish farmingAquaculture of tilapiaHydrology (agriculture)AquacultureEcologyBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though highly important in food and nutritional security of Ethiopia, fish production which usually comes from lakes and reservoirs is low irrespective of the natural and manmade water potentials of the country. Significant amounts of depressed land areas in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia are filled with flood during the rainy season, which stay for seasons or year round, where the use of these floodplains for fish production was not assessed in the country. The current study was aimed to assess suitability of seasonal and annual floodplains for fish production in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Water physical-chemical and biological parameters of Sango, the seasonal and Hara-Bata, the annual floodplains were compared with that of Lake Ziway and its wetlands between October, 2017 and January, 2018. Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) fish were also stocked into the floodplains at different times. Data were collected and analyzed to compare the mean values among the water bodies and against the parameter’s optimum requirements for fish culture. Water level in the study sites varied, which decreased at faster rate in both floodplains where the Sango lived only for eight months. Water turbidity, conductivity (µS/cm), water temperature, plankton diversity and abundance were significantly different ( P < 0.05) among the four water bodies. Water pH and conductivity of all the four water bodies were within the optimum range for fish culture. Water turbidity of the floodplains was very high to limit tilapia culture. Diversity and availability of phytoplankton was lower in the floodplains than in Ziway Lake and its wetland; however, zooplankton abundance is higher in Sango floodplain. Nile tilapia thrives in Ziway Lake and its wetlands; survived and reproduced in Hara-Bata though stunted in size but not survived in Sango floodplain due to higher turbidity levels. Water turbidity, depth and durability affect fish culture in the floodplains. Hence, watershed management to minimize erosion and silt load, plantation and conservation around the periphery of the floodplains and dredging refuge area for fish in shallow plains are recommended if fish production is intended in the floodplains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AquacultureSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207