MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388751505 · doi:10.46254/sa02.20210470

High Altitude Cosmic Radiation Measurement Using Stratospheric Balloon in Sorocaba Region – A STEM Experiment for High School Students

2021· article· en· W4388751505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tiago Ruivo Coelho, Sergio Shimura

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPayload (computing)Effects of high altitude on humansCosmic rayRemote sensingGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceBalloonEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringPhysicsMeteorologyEngineeringTelecommunicationsAstronomyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work shows the development of a platform for STEM experiments in high altitude using a stratospheric balloon, how it was developed, the challenges encountered in the whole process and the results of the first experiment carried out in this platform: cosmic radiation measurements from ground up to twenty kilometers in altitude.This platform features Globalsat GPS tracking, three cameras for recording video and still images and sensors for data collection.The onboard computer consists of Arduino and Labrador which are open source development boards with a BMP280 sensor for measuring temperature, pressure and altitude data that are stored in a mass memory card (microSD).The radiation is measured by a Geiger tube that captures alpha, beta and gamma radiation.The knowledge gathered in this experience including planning, launch, rescue and data analysis which are important to determine the onboard experiments constraints are shown and discussed.Finally, improvements concerning the payload space design and operational processes and important additional features such as telemetry and search-and-rescue aid electronics are proposed for the next launch that is scheduled for June 7, 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena→French-language works237,207→