MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388763749 · doi:10.1115/fpmc2023-110577

A Highly Compact, Multi-Material, Fluid Powered Actuation System for MRI-Guided Surgical Intervention

2023· article· en· W4388763749 on OpenAlexfundno aff
John E. Peters, Abby M. Grillo, Daniel S. Esser, Sarah Garrow, Nithin S. Kumar, Tyler Ball, Robert P. Naftel, Dario J. Englot, Joseph S. Neimat, William A. Grissom, Robert J. Webster, Eric J. Barth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthVanderbilt University
KeywordsActuatorStepperModular designFluidicsWorkspaceComputer scienceScannerTorqueMechanical engineeringRoboticsControl engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceRobotElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents an inherently safe, compact, 3D-printed, fluid-powered stepper actuation system enabling surgical precision within the demanding and confined space of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. The intense magnetic field and limited workspace of an MRI excludes the use of traditional, ferromagnetic robotics. Additionally, scanner image quality is sensitive to interference, creating a strict constraint on the electromagnetic and ferromagnetic signature of the actuator. While non-ferromagnetic, fluid powered actuators exist, they are often bulky and difficult to control. Using high resolution, material jetting technology, we’re able to 3D print small, standalone multi-material designs with variable rigidity. Leveraging these advances in additive manufacturing technology, we have developed a modular set of miniature flexible fluidic actuators (FFAs). These actuators are capable of translating, rotating, and gripping a slender rod and are inherently safe to valve, control, or pressure faults, due to the stepping sequence. Using a specific clinical application as a use case, we assembled these components into a highly compact needle steering system for MRI-guided neurosurgery. This two-degree-of-freedom actuation system is driven pneumatically, taking advantage of sterile, hospital instrument air and is electromagnetically transparent to the MRI scanner. In addition to detailing the actuator system design, this paper also demonstrates a robust, nonlinear control strategy for precision sub-step motion control. This paper reports the actuator system’s operating pressure and bandwidth, translational and rotational accuracy, and maximum force and torque capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207