Genome scans capture key adaptation and historical hybridization signatures in tetraploid wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tetraploid wheats (Triticum turgidum L.), including durum wheat (T. turgidum ssp. durum (Desf.) Husn.), are important crops with high nutritional and cultural values. However, their production is constrained by sensitivity to environmental conditions. In search of adaptive genetic signatures tracing historical selection and hybridization events, we performed genome scans on two datasets: (1) Durum Global Diversity Panel comprising a total of 442 tetraploid wheat and wild progenitor accessions including durum landraces (n = 286), domesticated emmer (T. turgidum ssp. dicoccum (Schrank) Thell.; n = 103) and wild emmer (T. turgidum ssp. dicoccoides (Korn. ex Asch. & Graebn.) Thell.; n = 53) wheats genotyped using the 90K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, and (2) a second dataset comprising a total 121 accessions of nine T. turgidum subspecies including wild emmer genotyped with >100 M SNPs from whole-genome resequencing. The genome scan on the first dataset detected six outlier loci on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 3A (n = 2), 6A, and 7A. These loci harbored important genes for adaptation to abiotic stresses, phenological responses, such as seed dormancy, circadian clock, flowering time, and key yield-related traits, including pleiotropic genes, such as HAT1, KUODA1, CBL1, and ZFN1. The scan on the second dataset captured a highly differentiated region on chromosome 2B that shows significant differentiation between two groups: one group consists of Georgian (T. turgidum ssp. paleocolchicum A. Love & D. Love) and Persian (T. turgidum ssp. carthlicum (Nevski) A. Love & D. Love) wheat accessions, while the other group comprises all the remaining tetraploids including wild emmer. This is consistent with a previously reported introgression in this genomic region from T. timopheevii Zhuk. which naturally cohabit in the Georgian and neighboring areas. This region harbored several adaptive genes, including the thermomorphogenesis gene PIF4, which confers temperature-resilient disease resistance and regulates other biological processes. Genome scans can be used to fast-track germplasm housed in gene banks and in situ; which helps to identify environmentally resilient accessions for breeding and/or to prioritize them for conservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".