MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Peut-on être inclusif ? Développer la capacité d’agir de la bibliothèque

2023· book-chapter· fr· W4388770345 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Clot

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angers, samedi 4 février 2023, 14 h 15 : journée portes ouvertes de l’université. Une jeune femme, étudiante, fait un malaise qui lui « coupe les jambes » et cherche un fauteuil où se poser. Une collègue sauveteuse secouriste du travail (SST) et formée aux premiers secours en santé mentale (PSSM) se trouve à proximité. Consciente qu’il se passe quelque chose, elle écourte la visite en cours et confie son groupe à l’accueil et s’agenouille pour se mettre à l’écoute de la jeune femme. Elle est...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation, sociology, and vocational training→French-language works237,207→